SUCHITHA KOLA 65, BIMONTHLY ASSESSMENT-JUNE 2021
BIMONTHLY ASSESSMENT-JUNE 2021
Greetings to one and all who are reading my blog.This is SUCHITHA.KOLA,RNO:65, a third Semester student.
I have been given this case with the theme of "Scholarship of integration in Medical education and Research" which is a primary tool to interact between the ongoing different systems or disciplines of knowledge, as being a part of health care system.
#QUESTION 1:COMPETENCY TESTED FOR PEER TO PEER REVIEW?
This the link of questions asking asked regarding the cases:
https://generalmedicinedepartment.blogspot.com/2021/06/bimonthly-formative-and-summative_19.html?m=1
•These are the Roll numbers of 10 students that I've selected for giving my review:1,6,3,2,100,65,88,97,17 &61.
1)CASE 1: PULMONOLOGY
•4/5
•The way of presentation about the evolution of symptoms are very well presented
•The flowcharts definitely made an impact in understanding
•Explanation for every treatment and cause are written in a very coherent manner.
2)CASE 2: NEUROLOGY
•5/5
•This is the best way of presentation I've seen from the whole link.
•The flowcharts in the blog are very helpful to understand the case
•Explanation for every answer was so detailed that every student can interpret it
3)CASE 3: NEUROLOGY:
•4/5
•The handwritten flowchart is very helpful in understanding the case
•The Mechanism of drug action are explained in a detailed way
•There is also a detailed view on biochemical findings and reasoning.
4)CASE 4: NEUROLOGY
•3/5
•The answers to the questions were written well but can be explained in more detailed form
•It could have been better if the answer was written directly after the question,which could make it easier to understand the context.
5)CASE 5: PULMONOLOGY
•5/5
•The case was very well presented and explained
•All the key words are very well highlighted
•The flow charts definitely made impact on the viewer.
6)CASE 6: CARDIOLOGY
• 3/5
•Each drug was mentioned and explained in detail about the mechanism and action
•The whole presentation was in a understandable way
•The only demerit is that it could me more interesting if she could have included more flowcharts and pictures.
7)CASE 7: CARDIOLOGY:
•4/5
•All the points were very well explained along with the references
•The Answers were to the point
•It is very well presented.
8)CASE 8: CARDIOLOGY
•3/5
•The indications and contradictions were described well
•But reasoning should have been included for each points for better understanding.
9)CASE 9: PULMONOLOGY
•4/5
•Adequate information was provided
•The answers are written well
•It would have been better if the keywords were highlighted.
10)CASE 10: NEUROLOGY
•5/5
•The presentation was remarkable
•Flowcharts were included wherever necessary
•The answers are up to the point
•Easily understandable.
#QUESTION 2:
#QUESTION 3:TO GIVE A CRITICAL APPRAISAL IN MY OWN WORDS:
ABDOMINAL:
•A 60 years old Female patient presented to the OPD with cheif complaints of pedal edema since 10days,with decreased Urine output since 10days and Fever since 10days.
PRO'S:
•Case sheet presentation was good
•All the patient data is sufficiently taken into the consideration
•Title of the case is appropriate and described the case sheets well
•There is a clear history of cheif complaints and past illness
•Treatment has been viewed well by presenting the day wise treatment plans
•Provisional diagnosis was proven right by the diagnostic tests at the end of the case.
CON'S:
•Basically in my point of view I like a pictorial way of presentation
•But there were no proper images demonstrating the pedal edema as mentioned in general examination
•Treatment history of the patient is not taken
•Not proper history of any allergies /drug allergies were taken
•We can try to elaborate the personal history.
#QUESTION 4: SEE THE DIAGNOSIS GIVEN,STEPS TAKEN, INVESTIGATIONS DONE AND READ THE LITERATURE AND WRITE ABOUT THEIR ACTION IN TOUR WORDS?
•MAJOR PROBLEMS OF THE PATIENT:
•Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2) for which he has been given Injection of human Actrapacid
•High grade fever,Emetesis,pain for which he has been given Orofea.
•Pitting pedal edema (LASIX)
•Acute Kidney injury due to Urosepsis, hyperkalemia (Norflox)
•Acidic pH-Nodosis
•TREATMENT:
•Injection human Actrapacid
•Neb plain Asthalin
•Ultracet
•Orofea
•LASIX
•Norflox
•Nodosis
•MY SUGGESTION IS THAT"CIPROFLOXACIN COULD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE PLACE OF NORFLOXACIN ,AS IT IS SEEN TO HAVE PRODUCED LESS NAUSEA AND VOMITING IN PATIENTS".
# QUESTION 5:
TESTING THE SCHOLARSHIP COMPETENCIES IN LOGGING REFLECTIVE OBSERVATIONS ON YOUR CONCRETE EXPERIENCES OF THE LAST MONTH?
In my point of view, Online teaching has played a key role in medical education in recent times .
Probably these assignments are helping us a lot to understand the basics of clinical practice like History taking, presentating the case,How to deal with a patient ,and a lot more.
I'm glad that beside all these pandemic demerits ,we are able to do some part of our work through these e-blogs indeed these are helping us to know different cases and different examinations.
Iam very overwhelmed to watch the tests and examinations that I have learned just virtually in my earlier classes to watch them directly and performing them indeed.
Beside All these ,I always have a thought of we not being present there physically in the college to take up the cases and our postings,which is probably an unfortunate thing for us .
To conclude with ,Thank you DR.RAKESH BISWAS SIR,for giving us this opportunity and for helping us grow knowledge even in these dark times and also the interns and pgs who are boosting up with the new knowledge we are getting as of now.
--------------THANKYOU----------
Comments
Post a Comment